Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Transportation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

House adopts substitute to State Highway Amendments, shifts specified roads to local control

Utah House of Representatives · January 31, 2007
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The House approved a first substitute to Senate Bill 20 (State Highway Amendments) after floor debate and a failed effort to 'circle' the bill for further study; the substitute passed 58–14 and returns the measure to the Senate.

The Utah House on Jan. 17 adopted a first substitute to Senate Bill 20, a yearly state highway amendments bill that includes transfers of certain state-maintained road segments to local jurisdictions.

Representative Dougal, sponsor of the bill, told members the substitute combines SR 41 into SR 28, removes a portion of SR 195 and returns it to local control, and removes the state road within the University of Utah (which includes light-rail) so cities can manage and maintain those streets. "I am supportive of greater local control," Dougal said when describing the substitute.

Members raised procedural and substantive concerns. Representative Becker asked whether the substitute received committee review; the sponsor and others acknowledged the substitute had not been through committee and recommended local discussions had informed the change. Representative McGee and others urged additional study; a motion to 'circle' the substitute — effectively to remove it from the calendar for more review — failed after debate.

After floor debate and a motion to adopt the substitute, the House recorded a final vote: the first substitute for Senate Bill 20 passed the House 58 yes, 14 no, 3 absent and will be returned to the Senate for its consideration.

Lawmakers highlighted both local-control arguments and concerns about fiscal implications and institutional impacts; a request for a fiscal note was discussed, with one member pointing out that fiscal notes can only be prepared after a bill is adopted.