Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Traffic Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Utah House passes teen cell-phone restriction after debate over safety and job exceptions
Summary
The House approved HB 217 to prohibit most cell-phone use by teen drivers, with exceptions for emergencies and limited employment needs. Lawmakers debated headset safety research, employment impacts and whether to assign license points; the bill passed as amended 45–27 and moves to the Senate.
The Utah House on Feb. 6 approved House Bill 217, a measure that bars most use of a wireless phone and text messaging by drivers in the teen license class, with limited exceptions for reporting criminal activity and emergencies.
Representative Corey Holdaway, the bill sponsor, said the measure targets inexperienced drivers and responds to classroom and constituent concerns that texting and calling while driving endangers teens. He described the change as “the cell phone restriction for teen drivers” and walked colleagues through the bill’s prohibitions and committee amendment making the offense secondary.
Opponents and supporters traded research and practical concerns on the House floor. Representative Morgan cited studies arguing that headsets and speakerphones “don't improve safety because it's the mental distraction of talking on the phone, not holding it,” and urged rejection of an amendment that would allow hands‑free devices. Representative Keiser, speaking as a small-business owner, argued for exceptions for employers who need to contact teenage employees and said he supports hands‑free use in practice.
A floor amendment offered by Representative Harper deleted language that would have allowed assignment of license points for the offense; Representative Holdaway and the driver's license division had requested that some portions be removed after committee. Representative Dahl and others argued for employment and emergency exceptions, noting special‑district workers who must remain reachable while on the job. Representative Holdaway framed the bill as a preventative safety step: "Do we wait until somebody dies in order to say this is a problem?" and urged passage.
After the House adopted an amendment clarifying employment and hands‑free provisions, the bill passed on final vote, 45 yes, 27 no. The bill will be transmitted to the Senate for further consideration.
The House record shows a mix of evidentiary claims (research on distraction, school surveys and local crash data) and policy judgments about the right balance between public safety and employment flexibility. The next legislative stop is Senate consideration, where sponsors said further debate and any interchamber changes can be addressed.
