Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Background Checks Higher Education topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

House approves higher education background-check bill after sponsor says Board of Regents will set policy

Utah House of Representatives · February 22, 2007
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

First substitute House Bill 196 would require criminal background checks for certain positions at public institutions of higher education; sponsors say the Board of Regents would make policy and universities would keep records in confidential personnel files. The House passed the bill 72–0 with three absent.

First substitute House Bill 196, which would require criminal background checks for specified positions at Utah’s public institutions of higher education, passed the House on a 72–0 vote and will be forwarded to the Senate.

Sponsor Representative Menlove told the House the bill targets sensitive positions — for example dorm workers and employees with direct access to students — and that the University Board of Regents would be given policy-making authority to implement the checks. Menlove said the proposal responds to instances where instructors working with high-school students in concurrent-enrollment settings lacked background checks appropriate to public education roles.

Representative Piskupski asked whether the bill contains safeguards controlling who can access background-check information and how broadly the checks would be shared. Representative Menlove replied that the bill delegates policy-making to the Board of Regents and that procedural lines in the bill outline how information is to be handled; she also said human-resources offices at institutions typically maintain such records in confidential personnel files and that employees who are denied or dismissed would receive written notice explaining reasons.

The Chair opened and closed the roll call; the Speaker announced first substitute House Bill 196 received 72 yes votes, 0 no votes and 3 absent. The bill will be sent to the Senate for further consideration.

Next steps: The Board of Regents is expected to adopt implementing policies under the bill's delegation; the transcript records that a fiscal note will be required.