Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Criminal Justice topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

House approves tougher penalty for assaults on peace officers

Utah House of Representatives · February 9, 2007
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Utah House passed a substitute to House Bill 275 clarifying that enhanced penalties for assaulting officers apply when a suspect is legally detained (including Terry stops); Representative Curtis Oda said the change corrects a prior drafting oversight. The bill passed 69-0 and moves to the Senate.

The Utah House on Jan. 30 approved a substitute to House Bill 275 to extend a prior penalty enhancement to situations where a suspect is legally detained prior to arrest, voting 69-0 to send the measure to the Senate.

Representative Curtis Oda, sponsor of the bill, told the House the bill corrects an oversight in prior legislation that increased penalties from a class A misdemeanor to a third-degree felony when bodily substances were intentionally propelled at an officer and caused contact with the face or an open wound. "This bill simply addresses that oversight to include such actions against an officer where the suspect is legally detained for suspicion of the illegal activity, but prior to making an arrest," Oda said. He emphasized the change does not apply in social or casual settings.

Oda said the earlier passage produced confusion among patrol officers because detainees had not been defined as prisoners under the prior statute; the substitute clarifies that the enhancement applies when the suspect is detained during an investigatory stop. Summation was waived, and the House closed the roll call with 69 yes votes and no recorded opposing votes. The bill will be referred to the Utah Senate for further consideration.

The House record shows no floor amendments to the substitute during debate; sponsors and other members declined extended summations and proceeded to an open roll call. The next procedural step for the bill is Senate consideration.