Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Legislative Process topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House approves giving vice chairs a vote on Executive Appropriations after heated amendment fight
Summary
The House passed House Joint Resolution 9 to allow vice chairs of the Executive Appropriations Committee to vote, rejecting an amendment to remove vice chairs; supporters said voting vice chairs improve committee functioning, opponents warned it would weaken minority influence. The measure passed 46–20 and was sent to the Senate.
Get email alerts on the Legislative Process topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Utah House on Friday approved House Joint Resolution 9 to allow the vice chair of the Executive Appropriations Committee to cast votes in that committee, after a contentious floor debate and a failed amendment to remove vice chairs entirely.
Sponsor Representative David Clark argued the change grants an experienced member greater capacity to participate in budget decisions. "To have that individual in that chair and then say we appreciate all your good work and service but by the way we're not going to give you an opportunity to cast your vote in that decision — I think is a step backwards," he said.
Representative Becker offered Amendment #1 to restore the committee numbers to the prior composition and remove vice chairs from voting, warning the change would reduce two-party balance and make it harder for the minority to influence appropriations. "If that imbalance now becomes greater, it will further reduce the two-party balance system that we try to maintain up here," Becker said.
Other members urged defeat of Becker's amendment, arguing vice chairs provide important experience and that outcomes would remain issue-based. Representative Ferry said the outcome would not change and that vice chairs' participation should be welcomed. After a motion to end debate, the House adopted the resolution. The Clerk announced 46 yes votes and 20 no; the resolution will be referred to the Senate for further consideration.
Next steps: the resolution moves to the Senate. Supporters framed the change as improving committee capacity; opponents recorded minority concerns about diminished negotiating leverage in appropriations.
