Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Eminent Domain topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

House passes eminent-domain limits for trails and creates task force after long debate

Utah House of Representatives · February 23, 2007
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After extended floor debate and multiple amendment votes, the House passed the third substitute to House Bill 334 restricting use of eminent domain for trail/linear recreational takings, adding emergency-access exceptions and creating an eminent-domain task force; final vote was 44—or, 20 gainst.

The Utah House on Feb. 22 passed a third substitute to House Bill 334 clarifying and restricting the circumstances under which government may use eminent domain to acquire private property for trails and certain linear recreational uses.

Sponsor Representative Kilton said the bill responds to recent local proposals to condemn narrow private strips for trails by labeling them as "parks" and thereby attempting to circumvent the prior restriction. He framed the substitute as protecting private property rights while preserving narrowly defined emergency-access authority and directing creation of a task force to work through remaining ambiguities.

Floor debate was extensive. Opponents and some legal advisers objected to broad intent language in earlier drafts that attempted to state prior legislative intent retroactively; several members argued that as currently constituted the House cannot authoritatively state the intent of prior legislatures and that such language could invite judicial challenge. Other speakers, including rural landowners and developers, described how even a narrow right-of-way could disrupt farm operations or impose safety risks.

Multiple substitute motions were offered. An amendment to remove retroactive/intent language was carried after a division and roll-call exchange; sponsors said the final text keeps protections against using eminent domain for trails and establishes a task force to resolve implementation questions, while ensuring the bill would not reopen cases with final adjudication.

The third substitute passed on the floor 44 yes to 20 no and will be transmitted to the Senate. Sponsors said they expect to continue work in an interim task force to craft permanent statutory language that balances public access and private-property protection.

What happens next: Bill is transmitted to the Senate; an eminent-domain task force will be convened as directed in the substitute.

Provenance: Debate and final passage documented on the floor; extensive amendments discussed between SEG 3312 and SEG 4283.