Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the State Retirement topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

House approves 2% retirement increase for early state retirees after floor debate

Utah House of Representatives · February 15, 2007
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Utah House passed House Bill 12 on Feb. 15, 2007, to grant a 2% multiplier for years of service to certain state retirees who retired before 1986. Lawmakers debated fiscal cost (fiscal note $3.6 million) and equity among retirement tiers before passage (56–9–10).

The Utah House on Feb. 15 approved House Bill 12, a bill that would grant a 2% multiplier to certain state retirees who left service before 1986, aiming to address a disparity between older defined‑contribution and later non‑contributory retirement systems.

Sponsor Luana Shurtleff said the change would restore equity for retirees left on a lower formula and described the group as "less than 5,000" people statewide who are increasingly vulnerable to rising costs. The fiscal note attached to the bill shows an estimated $3,600,000 annual cost, which the sponsor said would be considered by appropriators if funds become available.

Opponents urged caution about long‑term fiscal impacts. Representative Glass noted the $3.6 million is not a one‑time payment but an ongoing cost that would continue in perpetuity. Representative Dougal characterized the bill as retirees asking for "more money" after retirement. Several members emphasized the bill as a fairness matter and urged support for elderly public employees.

Representative Hansen said the bill would correct a 20 percentage‑point disparity between the two retirement systems and described it as a matter of equity for older retirees who had limited incomes. Representative Mathis declared a conflict of interest and noted his father is among those affected.

The House passed the bill and referred it to the Senate (vote recorded as 56 yes, 9 no, 10 absent). Next steps will be Senate consideration and any appropriations decisions by the Executive Appropriations Committee.