Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Waste Management topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House approves anti–flow-control measure for solid waste after debate over contracts and sunset
Summary
The House passed third substitute Senate Bill 46 to restrict local flow-control rules that require garbage to go to a jurisdiction-controlled facility; an amendment to shorten the sunset failed after members raised concerns about contracts with Hill Air Force Base and bond repayment.
Get email alerts on the Waste Management topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Utah House approved third substitute Senate Bill 46, aimed at limiting local "flow-control" ordinances that require collected solid waste to be taken to a specific facility.
Sponsor Representative Erkhart described the measure as permitting market competition for waste-hauling services by preventing jurisdictions from mandating where waste must be delivered, except in narrow circumstances. He said the bill was intended to curb anti-competitive government practices.
Representative Oda moved to shorten the bill's end date for existing flow-control arrangements, proposing a 2010 sunset instead of 2013; proponents of the shorter date argued bonds backing facilities had been repaid and local governments should not retain control indefinitely. Opponents — including members with knowledge of the local contracts — warned the earlier date could jeopardize an existing contract supplying electricity and steam to Hill Air Force Base and disrupt negotiated agreements. Representative Ray and others urged caution, noting there were remaining years on that base contract.
After extended floor debate that included the contract and bond-history arguments, the substitute motion to change the sunset date failed. The House then passed the amended third substitute on final vote, with the tally recorded as 52 yes, 17 no, and 7 absent. The bill will be forwarded to the Senate for further consideration.
Lawmakers noted the bill's policy intent was to open solid-waste hauling to competition while allowing limited exceptions where no alternative existed within a specified mileage. Members urged local governments and affected stakeholders to review contracts and transition plans in light of the change.
