Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Hb15 Std Prevention topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House moves to concur on STD prevention bill after lengthy debate over private providers
Summary
After extended floor debate about whether private clinics should be listed as resources, the Utah House voted 50–17 to concur with Senate amendments to H.B. 15 (control and prevention of sexually transmitted diseases) and will forward the bill to the Senate for the president's signature.
The Utah House on March 5 voted 50–17 to concur with Senate amendments to H.B. 15, a bill described by supporters as a public-awareness effort to inform residents where to obtain testing and treatment for sexually transmitted diseases.
Representative Reesen, who led the motion to refuse to concur earlier in the day, framed the issue as one of access in rural areas and urged colleagues to allow the Department of Health to list private providers as resources. "The amendments to this bill made in the Senate basically mean that any private agency that provides testing or treatment for the [STDs] that this bill targets would not be able to be listed as a resource that people can access," Reesen said, warning that some counties rely on private clinics for testing and treatment.
Opponents, including Representative Tilton, argued the bill should emphasize primary-care physicians and family doctors. "A personal physician or family physician is much better able to follow up and help with the treatment of these types of issues," Tilton said during debate, adding he was reluctant to designate private agencies as the primary resource.
Other members pressed both access and public-health concerns. Representative Litvak said embarrassment and confidentiality can keep young people from seeking care, noting local health departments in several rural counties do not offer both testing and treatment. Representative Johnson said many people contracting STDs lack primary-care physicians and need clinic-based information and services.
The House first considered a motion to refuse to concur with the Senate amendments, but that motion failed on a division vote (36–37), leaving the bill on the concurrence calendar. Later in the session, the House voted to concur with the Senate amendments by recorded vote, 50 yes to 17 no. The speaker pro tem will sign the measure and it will be sent to the Senate for the president's signature.
The House record shows supporters repeatedly described H.B. 15 as a public-health information measure; sponsors said no state funds are being directed to private providers and that money discussed in floor remarks was to support the Department of Health's awareness campaign. Additional technical or funding details beyond floor statements were not specified in the transcript.
The House recessed after concluding the day's business; the bill now moves back to the Senate for completion of the enrollment and signature process.
