Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Education topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

House debate narrows K–3 class‑size incentive bill; amendment adopted, vote opened

Utah House of Representatives · February 25, 2008
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Members debated HB194, an incentive grant program to reduce K–3 class sizes to targeted averages; Representative Newbold's amendment allows schools without physical space to qualify by hiring paraeducators; the amendment was adopted and floor voting was opened at the end of the transcript.

House Bill 194, a K–3 class‑size reduction incentive program, drew extended floor debate and a successful amendment before the House took the measure to a vote.

Sponsor Representative Karen Morgan described the bill as a targeted incentive program that would fund reductions in average class sizes for kindergarten through third grade, listing target averages of 18 (K), 20 (1st) and 22 (2nd–3rd) students and a fiscal note of $26,000,000. The measure creates application and accountability requirements and specifies that schools failing to meet targets must return funds.

Representative Newbold moved an amendment to remove the bill’s ‘‘first priority’’ language so schools that cannot reduce physical class size (because of facility limits) could compete on an equal basis by hiring paraeducators or other allowable staff. Newbold argued the change would allow schools with physical constraints to benefit from the program if they could not create more classrooms.

The sponsor acknowledged mixed feelings on the amendment but ultimately the body approved the floor change, clarified that grant language would read ‘‘shall’’ rather than ‘‘may,’’ and instructed that the priority language be coordinated accordingly. Members questioned accountability, past audits of class‑size funds and the balance between state incentives and local control; the sponsor said the incentive program includes stronger reporting and return‑of‑funds provisions than prior budget items.

At the close of the transcript the House had adopted the amendment and voting on HB194 was opened; the voting outcome is not recorded in the provided transcript.