Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Water Conservation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Water‑conservation bill fails after debate over sponsorship and development tradeoffs
Summary
House defeated HB137, a bill to create a State Facility Water Conservation Program, on a 31–40 vote after floor debate about the bill’s sponsorship (Utah Rivers Council) and potential constraints on future water development.
House Bill 137, a proposal to create a State Facility Water Conservation Program, failed in the Utah House on a 31–40 vote after floor debate.
Sponsor Representative Wiley said the bill would make the state a model for water conservation at public facilities by setting water‑wise design standards for new buildings and providing voluntary guidance for existing facilities through the Division of Water Resources. Wiley highlighted conservation progress and argued structural changes could save water and energy.
Opponents questioned whether sponsoring organizations such as the Utah Rivers Council and allied environmental groups would later oppose water‑development projects and said the sponsor’s characterization of prior state action on conservation was inaccurate. Representative Noel cited existing programs such as Slow the Flow and other legislative actions, and urged members to focus on the bill’s merits rather than perceived sponsor motives.
The House ultimately voted against the measure; supporters said the state still faces large per‑capita water use and reiterated long‑term conservation goals, but the bill did not secure a majority in the House.
