Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Natural Resources topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House narrowly approves modest trails appropriation after debate over state vs. local role
Summary
First substitute House Bill 104 provides $250,000 ongoing and $250,000 one‑time in trail development funding (targeted to first‑ and second‑class counties) with a local 50/50 match; the House passed the bill after debate about whether trail funding should be a state or local responsibility.
First substitute House Bill 104, an appropriation to restore modest, partly ongoing funding for local trail development, passed the Utah House on Feb. 6 after extended floor debate on the proper role of state government.
Representative Holdaway, the sponsor, said the bill restores some ongoing trail development funding that was cut during the economic downturn. The version before the floor provided $250,000 ongoing plus $250,000 one‑time for trail work in first‑ and second‑class counties and requires a 50/50 local match.
Supporters argued trails are popular with constituents and provide economic and recreational benefits; Representative Draxler said local surveys showed trails outranked other priorities. Opponents cautioned against state government displacing local planning and warned an available state pot might encourage projects lacking local buy‑in.
Holdaway responded that the bill includes local participation requirements and cited unanimous support in the League of Cities and Towns and the Utah Association of Counties during committee consideration.
The House approved the bill on a close voice/record vote (38 yes, 29 no, 8 absent) and it will be forwarded to the Senate for further consideration.
What’s next: the appropriation will move to the Senate; implementation will require disbursement rules and verification of local matches by Natural Resources or the appropriate administering agency.
