Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Fire Suppression Budget topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

House exempts supplemental fire suppression appropriations from spending cap

Utah House of Representatives · February 1, 2008
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

First Substitute House Bill 294 passed the House to exclude supplemental state land fire-suppression expenditures from the state spending cap, a measure sponsors said is needed to preserve partner confidence after high-cost fire seasons.

The Utah House approved First Substitute House Bill 294, an appropriation-limit amendment that would ensure supplemental expenditures for fire suppression on state lands are not constrained by the state spending cap.

Sponsor Representative (recorded as Representative Ferri) said the bill is intended to protect the state's ability to respond to large fire events and preserve confidence with federal and local partners. He described a range of annual spending and noted the base budget for fire suppression is $2,000,000 while extraordinary seasons can require much larger outlays. "In the Milford fire, this last year alone, we spent $25,000,000 suppressing that," the sponsor said, arguing the measure would prevent an artificial cap from jeopardizing critical suppression partnerships.

Colleagues asked whether the state could simply reprioritize expenditures under the cap rather than exempt a category. Representative Wimmer and Representative Bigelow said they worried about piecemeal removals from the cap and urged broader consideration of what emergency expenditures should be outside the cap. The sponsor said the bill does not alter prioritization or statutory authority for suppression actions but would allow necessary supplemental appropriations to fall outside the cap.

The House voted to pass the bill by 46 yes to 24 no, with 5 recorded absent, and the measure will be referred to the Senate for further consideration.