Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Building Codes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House adopts changes to building-code adoption process, shifting more authority to Legislature
Summary
The House approved SB 211 to change how Utah adopts national building, plumbing and fire codes: commissions will recommend code changes but the Legislature will have the approving authority, with emergency administrative rules allowed. Sponsors said the change provides elected accountability and prevents automatic adoption of national requirements such as mandated residential sprinklers. The bill passed 48–23.
The Utah House approved Senate Bill 211 on March 12, 2009, a measure that alters the state's building-code adoption process by moving final approval authority to the Legislature and its interim Business and Labor committee while keeping the Building Code Commission’s role in recommending and holding public hearings.
Representative Keiser, presenting SB211, said the change is intended to increase accountability for code decisions and cited national code proposals—such as a push for mandatory residential fire-suppression systems—as examples of policies better reviewed by elected officials. Under the bill, the Utah Uniform Building Code Commission and the Utah Fire Prevention Board will continue to hold hearings and make recommendations; to adopt or amend codes, the Business and Labor Interim Committee or a legislator would have to act. Emergency administrative rules would still be permitted but would be repealed if not enacted by the Legislature in the following session.
Floor debate included concerns about technical expertise and legislative workload, with some members urging safeguards to keep architects, engineers and technical experts involved. Representative Wiley proposed a divided amendment addressing electrical code selection and commission membership; part 1 failed and part 2 (membership changes) failed on initial voice but subsequent procedural votes addressed discrete components. After debate and a motion to end debate, the House passed SB211, 48 yes to 23 no, and the bill was returned to the Senate for the President’s signature.
Supporters argued the change restores accountability to elected officials; opponents warned that technical expertise and safety could be harmed if codes become politicized.
