Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Recreational Access topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Utah House debates recreational-access bill and rejects single-word amendment that would ease stream listings
Summary
Lawmakers debated third substitute House Bill 187, which would create a policy board to publish a yearly list of private streams open for recreation. An amendment changing a single word — replacing 'and' with 'or' in a key standard — failed after extended floor debate and a division vote (32–41); the bill was then circled for later action.
The Utah House spent much of its March 6 floor session debating third substitute House Bill 187, a measure that would create a policy board to publish an annual list of streams and rivers on private land where the public may engage in recreational activities.
Representative Ferri, the bill sponsor, told the House the substitute replaces an advisory board with a policy board that will publish a single list each year to coincide with the state—s fishing proclamation, and will promulgate criteria and rules to ensure public access does not —unreasonably impair— landowners— property rights. He said the third substitute also adds 11 additional streams, bringing the statutory list to 41 named waters, and that the change is intended to provide certainty for landowners, the public and law enforcement.
The most contested moment came when Representative Draxler moved to amend line 3 87 by striking the word "and" and replacing it with "or." Draxler said the change would allow the board either to find that a stream provides a significant recreational opportunity or that authorization would not unreasonably impair a bed owner's property rights, which he argued would make it possible to consider more waters without forcing the board to adjudicate prescriptive-easement claims.
Sponsor Ferri and other opponents responded that changing the single word would remove a crucial backstop for private property owners, leaving landowners— interests at the mercy of an independent policy board. Representative Ferri argued the language is the fulcrum of the compromise that allows the Legislature to delegate listing authority to a board while preserving property-rights protections. Representative Webb and Representative McKiff echoed that view, saying the current text balances policy-board authority with protections for property owners.
A member identified in the transcript as speaker 9 urged more time and deliberation, saying the change could represent "a possible change of a century-old policy" in Utah and recalling constituent pressure on both sides of the issue. The floor voted to end debate on the amendment and proceeded to a division. The motion to change "and" to "or" failed 32 yes to 41 no.
After the vote, Representative Ferri asked the House to circle the bill for later consideration, noting a minor stream identification issue still needs correction. The motion to circle the bill passed, delaying final action and leaving the third substitute in place for future consideration.
Next steps: the bill remains on the House calendar (circled) and may be returned for further amendment or final vote at a later date.
