Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Service Animals topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House narrows treatment of emotional-support animals in public settings; bill wins 62-9
Summary
Senate Bill 173 clarifies the difference between service animals and emotional-support/psychiatric therapy animals, addressing concerns about untrained animals in schools, stores and public events; the House passed the bill 62-9 after anecdotes and stakeholder endorsements.
The Utah House passed Senate Bill 173 on the floor to tighten statutory distinctions between service animals and emotional-support or psychiatric therapy animals. Sponsor Representative Grover said the bill is intended to protect highly trained service animals that assist people with disabilities and to address unintended consequences that followed prior inclusion of ESAs in the service-animal definition.
Members cited examples of problems that arose under the broader ESA definition, including animals in grocery stores, college housing and other public settings. Representative Sandstrom, describing an anecdote from his years as an airline pilot, called the measure the “pigs gone wild” bill after recounting a widely cited episode in which a large animal caused disruption on an aircraft. Supporters said the bill is grounded in protecting service animals’ function and public safety; schools, food-industry representatives and disability-access groups supported clarifying the law.
The House recorded final passage of SB 173 with 62 yes votes and 9 no votes. The bill was transmitted back to the Senate for the President’s signature.
What happens next: With House passage, SB 173 will return to the Senate for final enrollment; sponsor and stakeholders said administrative guidance and outreach would be needed to implement changes in schools and public facilities.
