Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the State Owned Land Swap topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House approves bill enabling state–UTA land swap after debate over protection for 3,000‑year‑old archaeological site
Summary
The House passed HB 179 to permit a permissive land swap involving the Department of Natural Resources, UTA, Draper City and a private developer to site a commuter rail station; lawmakers pressed sponsors on provisions to preserve an archaeological site and on federal/NEPA requirements; bill passed 52–21.
Get email alerts on the State Owned Land Swap topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
SALT LAKE CITY — The Utah House on Wednesday approved House Bill 179, enabling certain state agencies to negotiate a permissive land swap that supporters say will help position a Utah Transit Authority commuter rail station while preserving open space and archaeological resources.
Representative Carrie Gibson, the bill sponsor, described the measure as permissive enabling legislation that would allow several parties — including the Department of Natural Resources, UTA, Draper City and a private developer — to negotiate a land exchange intended to keep open space and place a transit stop in a more suitable location. "By allowing this deal to continue, those then as well would be brought in under the state protection," Gibson said, adding the intent is not to build on archaeological sites and that the swap could add protection for some private parcels.
Several members raised specific concerns about a parcel said in materials to contain a 3,000‑year‑old Native American village and asked what statutory protections apply. Representative Janice Fisher said the site is "3,000 years old with some very well preserved" artifacts and urged colleagues to protect the area rather than legislate a swap she said could risk the site. Representative Wheatley asked whether existing state law would ensure protection; Gibson pointed to language in the bill (lines 73–74) and other state code sections requiring permits and protections for surveys and excavation.
Questions about federal involvement and environmental review also arose. Representative Wiley noted that if federal funds are involved (through UTA), National Environmental Policy Act and ARPA (Antiquities-related) mitigation and review would be required before construction; Representative Wiley said such reviews should ensure mitigation that archaeologists would set. Representative Hughes, who declared a conflict of interest as a trustee of UTA, said federal and state processes would not be circumvented and that the swap could make excavation and archiving more accessible to archaeologists.
Sponsor Gibson called the bill a rare example of agencies and local government working together and said the language preserves open space and archaeological values while enabling negotiations. "We maintain the open space. We maintain the archaeological value. We allow for the track station to be in the right place," she said.
The House agreed to previous question, the bill was called for final action and passed 52 yes, 21 no. The bill will be transmitted to the Senate for further consideration.
