Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Firearms Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House passes bill clarifying Utah firearm 'loaded' rules; sponsors say it aligns law with other states
Summary
The House approved first substitute HB357, sponsored by Rep. Stephen Sandstrom, to clarify statutory definitions of a 'loaded' firearm and to allow law-abiding citizens to possess loaded firearms in certain private settings; the bill passed 65-8 and moves to the Senate.
Get email alerts on the Firearms Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Utah House on May 5 passed first substitute House Bill 357, a firearms‑related measure sponsored by Representative Stephen Sandstrom that its backers said clarifies ambiguous current law rather than expands prohibitions.
Sandstrom told colleagues the bill resolves confusion about what statutory language means by a "loaded" firearm and would make it lawful for a law‑abiding person to have a loaded handgun in a private automobile, in a place of business under their control, or in their own home. "If you have a loaded firearm under your pillow next to your bed in your own home, currently under state law that is illegal," Sandstrom said during floor remarks, arguing the bill restores predictability and aligns Utah with about 15 other states.
Opponents raised safety concerns on the floor. Representative Hemingway said she had spoken with constituents who described homes burglarized while children were present; she said a parent keeping a loaded, concealed weapon in a home with unsupervised children was "wrong" and that she would oppose the bill. Other members questioned whether the state Chiefs of Police Association had taken a position and sought clarification of technical distinctions in the law about ammunition being "in the magazine" versus "in the chamber." Sandstrom and members discussed the current statutory test that treats firearms requiring two separate actions to fire as "unloaded," an approach that treats some semiautomatic and revolver designs differently.
Sandstrom emphasized the bill does not change where or by whom firearms may be possessed in public or in locations where weapons are prohibited. After floor debate and a summation by the sponsor, voting was opened and closed; the House recorded 65 yes and 8 no. The bill will be transmitted to the Senate for consideration.
What happens next: The bill moves to the Utah Senate for committee consideration and possible floor action. If enacted, sponsors said, its purpose is to reduce criminal liability for people they described as law‑abiding citizens by clarifying the scope of the "loaded" definition.
Key quote: "This really is a clarifying law," sponsor Stephen Sandstrom said, urging colleagues to "bring this ambiguity and inconsistencies in the law back in line with other states."
