Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Distracted Driving topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House rejects conference report on cellphone restrictions for drivers under 18
Summary
The House failed to adopt the conference committee substitute for SB113, which would have restricted wireless phone use by minors with an affirmative-defense framework and upgraded some violations toward a Class C misdemeanor; motion failed 32–35.
The House declined to adopt the conference committee report on Senate Bill 113, a measure aimed at restricting wireless telephone use by drivers under 18.
Representative Dougal, floor sponsor for the conference report, explained that the conference substitute altered the original language to make certain exceptions an "affirmative defense" rather than a permissive exemption and included a Class C misdemeanor provision in some sections. Several members criticized the policy shift, saying the affirmative-defense approach means juveniles who are ticketed would later need to present proof in court rather than resolving the matter roadside.
Representative Riesen and others raised specific concerns about medical-emergency exceptions and whether the substitute unduly criminalized necessary calls by minors. Supporters of the conference compromise argued the language provides enforcement parity and that law enforcement would exercise discretion; Representative Briesen said medical-emergency use is covered as an affirmative defense and that officers commonly exercise discretion not to issue citations when defenses are evident.
After floor debate, the motion to adopt the conference committee report failed by a recorded vote of 32 yes and 35 no. The Speaker signaled that a new conference committee would be appointed.
Because the House rejected the conference language, the bill’s future depends on continued negotiations between the chambers.
