Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Sb 188 Charter Schools topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House adopts charter‑school amendments removing statutory enrollment cap; controversy over enrollment and class‑size rules
Summary
The House passed Senate Bill 188, a package of charter‑school amendments that removes a statutory 1.4% enrollment cap and ties charter growth to legislative appropriations while clarifying notice, transfer, and governance rules. Sponsors said growth will be guided by appropriations; some members raised questions about class‑size implications and enrollment procedures.
Senate Bill 188, presented to the House March 10 by Representative Rebecca Lockhart, received significant floor attention before passage. Lockhart said the bill removes the statutory enrollment cap on charter schools (currently codified as 1.4% of a district’s enrollment) and instead bases growth on the appropriation level the Legislature provides for charter expansion. The bill also includes procedural rules for parents withdrawing students from charters (timing lines referenced in statute) and for a process to return charter students to district schools when capacity allows. Finally, the bill adds a nonvoting member of the State Charter School Board to the State Board of Education and includes provisions addressing potential conflicts of interest for charter board members.
During floor questions members asked whether the change affects class‑size caps; the sponsor and others clarified that class sizes are set by individual charters as approved by the chartering authorities and that the bill targets an overall cap on charter enrollment growth rather than classroom maximums. Technical and clarifying Amendment No. 4 (and other technical fixes) were adopted on the floor. Representative Lockhart said the growth mechanism will track appropriations so the legislature controls scale via funding decisions.
The measure passed in the House on a wide margin (72 yes, 0 no) and will return to the Senate for further consideration. Sponsors and questioners urged close attention to implementation language and notice timelines to ensure students can transition between charter and district schools without unintended enrollment disruptions.
