Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Floor Session Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Utah House passes a slate of bills Feb. 24; votes at a glance
Summary
The Utah House on Feb. 24 passed multiple bills and concurrent resolutions, including measures on defendant transport fees, construction trade licensing, a methamphetamine housing checkoff, and an autism treatment fund; several items were circled or returned to committees for further work.
Get email alerts on the Floor Session Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Utah House of Representatives met Feb. 24 and moved a broad set of measures through the chamber, approving bills on criminal-justice fees, construction licensing, housing remediation for methamphetamine-contaminated properties, and a restricted autism treatment fund.
Major floor outcomes included: HB426 (Bail Bond Licensing Amendments) — passed 65–0 and transmitted to the Senate; HB311 (first substitute, Autism and Treatment Fund) — passed 69–0 and transmitted to the Senate; SB12 (individual income tax checkoff for methamphetamine housing reconstruction) — passed as amended 63–5; SB20 (local district groundwater management) — passed 66–0; SB22 (conference committee substitute, notary public) — concurred 68–1; SB76 (Trust Deed Amendments) — passed 67–0; SB85 (Construction Trade Licensing Act amendments, as amended) — passed 68–2; SB58 (transportation expenses for defendants) — passed 72–0; and first substitute SB41 (Drug Utilization Review Board amendments) — passed 63–7.
Several procedural moves were notable: Representative Mascaro successfully moved to reconsider HB190 (Disclosure of Methamphetamine Contaminated Property Act amendments) and the bill was circled for immediate third reading consideration; the Rules Committee report lifted and reassigned many bills to standing committees for future hearings. The House recessed for the afternoon at 2:00 p.m.
The votes documented on the floor and the bills sent back to the Senate or to committees reflect both technical statutory changes (for example, trust-deed timelines in SB76) and policy choices with fiscal or equity implications (for example, fee increases in SB58 and the voluntary tax checkoff in SB12).
