Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the States Rights topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Utah House passes states' rights resolution after hours of floor debate

Utah House of Representatives · February 19, 2010
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Utah House on Feb. 19 passed a concurrent resolution asserting states' rights (HCR2) after a lengthy, partisan floor debate over federal authority, national debt and strategy toward Washington. Supporters framed the measure as a defense of state sovereignty; opponents cited the Utah Constitution and warned of counterproductive litigation.

SALT LAKE CITY — The Utah House voted 57–13 on Feb. 19 to approve First Substitute HCR2, a concurrent resolution asserting the powers reserved to states under the Tenth Amendment and criticizing federal control of state lands, education and health care.

Representative Julie Fischer, the House sponsor, told colleagues the resolution was a response to what she called federal overreach and a way for states to press for more authority over public lands, healthcare and education. "We've reached our boiling point," Fischer said, citing concerns about national monuments and federal debt.

Opponents urged caution. Representative Hansen pointed to the Utah Constitution, urging the chamber to remember Article 1, Section 3, which describes Utah as part of the federal union, and argued the resolution risked mischaracterizing the state's relationship with Washington. Other critics recommended dialogue with federal officials rather than symbolic resolutions or litigation.

Debate ranged across procedural and political lines. Representative Lipback pressed for seeking common ground and criticized what he described as "stone throwing" between branches and parties; Representative Herrod defended the resolution as asserting state prerogatives; Representative Fisher summarized supporters' argument that states can and should push back on federal policies perceived as burdensome.

After the previous question was ordered and final summation by Rep. Fisher, the House approved the resolution. The measure, a concurrent resolution, will be transmitted to the Senate for its consideration.

The vote closes the day's debate on HCR2; the resolution does not itself change state law but signals the Legislature's position to federal officials and other states.