Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Health Tobacco topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House passes tighter nicotine-product restrictions after debate over e-cigarettes
Summary
The Utah House approved a third-substitute to HB71 to prohibit nicotine ‘candies’ marketed to children and addressed advertising concerns; an amendment to exempt e-cigarettes was adopted after floor debate about cessation benefits and chemical risks. Final passage: 54-17.
The Utah House on Feb. 5 approved a third-substitute version of HB71, a bill aimed at banning nicotine products packaged and marketed like candy and adding restrictions on advertising, after a lengthy floor debate that included an amendment carving out e-cigarettes.
Sponsor Representative Paul Ray said the bill’s primary goal is to block nicotine candies that appear and are packaged like sweets and that could appeal to children. Ray told colleagues that several products were being test-marketed to look ‘‘like Tic Tacs’’ and warned of acute toxicity risks for toddlers, citing FDA studies and industry packaging that targets young consumers.
Why it matters: lawmakers said the measure seeks to prevent nicotine addiction beginning in childhood and to head off products that could circumvent existing tobacco rules. Ray said the bill also revises some advertising language he worried might raise constitutional concerns, which prompted the third-substitute drafting.
Key floor exchanges centered on whether to exempt electronic cigarettes. Representative Reesen offered Amendment No.1 (dated 02/04/2010) to remove e-cigarettes from the bill, arguing some people use them successfully as smoking-cessation devices. Supporters of the amendment said more study is needed on e-cigarettes’ net public-health effect; opponents, including the sponsor, pointed to published reports the floor characterized as showing potentially dangerous additives (Representative Ray referenced diethylene glycol and other chemicals).
Representatives who supported the exemption argued e-cigarettes can reduce secondhand smoke and help adults quit combustible tobacco; those opposed said the products’ chemical safety profile and youth appeal were not yet clear. Ray said his original intent was to target nicotine candies and that the e-cigarette coverage ‘‘happened’’ as bills were consolidated, but he would accept the body’s decision.
The House adopted the amendment and then voted on the bill as amended. Third substitute HB71 passed final passage, 54 yes to 17 no, and was transmitted to the Senate for consideration.
Votes and next steps: the House’s passage sends the amended bill to the Senate, where it will receive its own committee and floor consideration.
Source note: reporting here is based exclusively on floor remarks and roll-call totals read into the record during the Feb. 5 session.
