Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Voter Id topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House rejects bill to allow Medicare card as standalone voter ID; debate centers on access vs. photo‑ID protections
Summary
Lawmakers debated and rejected HB 79, which would have allowed Medicare cards as one form of voter identification to ease voting for seniors; proponents cited access and low fraud rates, opponents warned about weakening photo‑ID standards. The bill failed, 27–47.
The Utah House debated House Bill 79 on Jan. 28, a proposal by Representative Marie Paulson to permit a Medicare card as an accepted form of voter identification for certain voters — primarily seniors who lack a current photo ID. Representative Paulson said the change was narrowly tailored to help older voters who no longer drive and lack utility bills or other picture IDs.
"HB 79 makes a simple change focused just on this population," Paulson said, adding that the bill "adds the option of a Medicare card as ID." She and other supporters argued that Medicare cards are commonly carried, are issued after a Social Security enrollment process that provides cross‑checks, and that the change would reduce inadvertent disenfranchisement of elderly voters.
Sponsors cited audit and survey evidence on fraud: Paulson referenced a 2005 legislative audit that flagged 14 questionable records out of more than one million voters (the sponsor cited the figure as 14 of over 1,000,000) and a 2009 Brennan Center survey of county election officials that reported no instances of fraud in sampled jurisdictions. Supporters said the incidence of fraud was negligible and that registration checks (driver’s license or Social Security verification) remain in place.
Opponents, including members who helped craft the state’s voter‑ID framework, argued the bill risked weakening a photo‑ID standard enacted in the prior session. Representative Frank and others emphasized that existing lists of acceptable IDs include many picture‑bearing documents and that provisional ballots and registration safeguards already exist to help voters who lack immediate ID. Some speakers said the bill created a slippery standard without a photo and could erode public confidence in election integrity.
Floor managers moved to close debate and proceed to a vote. HB 79 failed on the floor by a vote of 27 yes and 47 no. Members who supported the bill said they would continue to pursue measures to ease voting access for elderly constituents, while opponents said they wanted to prioritize safeguards to ensure votes count accurately.
The House record shows extended floor discussion with several members offering personal anecdotes about elderly relatives and practical barriers to securing picture ID, and other members cautioning that the existing combination of registration checks and provisional ballots should remain the primary protections for ballot integrity.
