Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Criminal Homicide And Reproductive Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House approves tighter criminal definition of abortion after heated debate; sponsors add protections for miscarriages and women seeking legal care
Summary
The Utah House passed HB12 on Jan. 29, 2010, narrowing the statutory definition of abortion and removing an exemption from prosecution for illegal abortions; sponsors added amendments to protect women who reasonably believed they were seeking lawful care and to limit criminal liability to high mental-state standards.
Get email alerts on the Criminal Homicide And Reproductive Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Representative Karl Wimmer, sponsor of House Bill 12, said the bill "narrowly defines an abortion as a medical procedure conducted by a physician or under the care of a physician" and removes an exemption from prosecution for illegal abortions. Wimmer framed the measure as a response to a specific case in Vernal and said the bill contains two principal changes: a statutory definition of abortion and removal of the prosecutorial exemption for women who seek illegal abortions.
The House adopted two amendments during floor debate intended to reduce unintended consequences. Representative Selig's Amendment 3, as explained from the floor, ensures that "if a physician does not follow the requirements under the law the woman cannot be charged or held criminally liable if she is under the belief that she is seeking a legal abortion." Representative Riesen and others offered Amendment 4 to address concerns that women who miscarry could face prosecution; sponsors characterized these as "friendly" amendments designed to avoid such outcomes.
Opponents warned the bill could reach beyond the isolated Vernal case. One member cited a statistic discussed on the floor: "we have... 6,000 miscarriages in the state of Utah every year," and argued the bill could subject grieving women to invasive investigations and prosecutorial scrutiny. Lawmakers questioned burden and culpability standards. In response, Wimmer and supporters said the amendments raise the mental-state threshold to reckless, knowing or intentional conduct and remove criminal negligence as a basis for prosecution; as Wimmer summarized, the culpability "is very high standard."
Supporters emphasized protection for unborn children and cited victim testimony submitted to the legislature. Wimmer read a statement from the adoptive mother of the child in the Vernal case describing the child's recovery and urged passage to protect fetuses at advanced stages of development.
The House voted to consider HB12 read for its first, second and third readings under suspension and then on final passage. HB12 passed the House 59 yes to 12 no and will be transmitted to the Senate for further consideration.
What's next: The bill will be transmitted to the Utah Senate; sponsors and opponents both signaled this issue may draw further review at that chamber.
