Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Water Financing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House funds Water Issues Task Force to study potential GO bond financing for water projects
Summary
House Bill 428 passed 53–17 to fund a Water Issues Task Force with $9,100 to study whether state GO bonds could finance major water projects and produce interest‑cost savings; sponsors cited possible multi‑million‑dollar savings on large pipeline projects but some agricultural stakeholders expressed concern about overlap with existing bodies.
The Utah House on March 7 approved House Bill 428, a request for $9,100 to convene a Water Issues Task Force to study financing options for large water projects and whether state general obligation bond financing—currently used for schools—could be applied to water projects. The bill passed 53–17 and will be transmitted to the Senate.
Representative Painter, sponsor of the bill, said task force meetings (estimated six) would examine whether constitutional change or other statutory adjustments could allow water projects to access GO bond financing and thereby lower interest costs on billion‑dollar projects such as Bear River and the St. George pipeline. He cited an example in which the Water Resources Board issued $67 million in bonds for a Provo River Canal project and suggested GO bond treatment could have saved nearly $2 million in interest on a single issuance.
Representatives asked whether the new task force would duplicate existing commissions. Painter said the new task force would have a narrow focus on constitutional amendment possibilities for water financing, distinguishing it from the broader State Water Development Commission and a Department of Natural Resources task force. Representative Ivory said agricultural communities had raised concerns about overlapping groups and asked the sponsor to clarify the new task force’s unique role. Representative Seggers supported the bill, calling $9,100 a modest investment given potential returns.
After questions and a waived summation, the House voted 53–17 in favor; the bill will now go to the Senate.
The task force, if convened, will report back to the legislature and could inform future bills on financing mechanisms for large water‑infrastructure projects.
