Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Tobacco Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Utah House passes law banning smoking in cars with children; first-year warning, small fine included
Summary
After extended debate, the Utah House on March 7, 2011 approved First Substitute House Bill 89 to prohibit smoking in vehicles when children 15 and under are present. Lawmakers split over enforcement and a proposed education-only substitute failed 30–43 before the final bill passed 39–35.
The Utah House of Representatives on March 7 approved First Substitute House Bill 89, banning smoking in a vehicle when a child 15 or younger is present and making the offense a secondary violation with a maximum fine of $45.
Representative Arendt, the bill sponsor, told the House the measure is aimed at protecting children from concentrated secondhand smoke in the small, enclosed space of a car. "Secondhand smoke causes lifetime damage to the developing lungs of young children," she said, citing public-health studies and endorsements from multiple health organizations. Under the substitute, the first year of enforcement will be a warning-only period; police officers are to hand out informational pamphlets (which the sponsor said will not be paid for with public funds). The fine may be waived if the violator enrolls in a smoking-cessation class.
Opponents and supporters sparred over whether education alone could protect children. Representative Dawe moved a second substitute that would have made the bill education-focused, arguing officers handing out pamphlets would be less intrusive and more effective than criminal penalties. "If we're going to start looking at all the enclosed spaces where we should ban smoking, the list gets pretty long," Dawe said in floor remarks urging the body to favor education over enforcement.
Representative Arendt and others countered that public-education campaigns have not fully protected the most vulnerable and that a statutory prohibition strengthens the state's ability to curb harmful behavior: "Just having someone hand out a pamphlet is not enough," Arendt said. Lawmakers also debated whether a citation could be used as evidence of child abuse; an amendment preserving language that the violation may not be used as the basis for child-abuse evidence drew floor attention and was discussed during substitute consideration.
A roll-call division on the education-focused substitute failed, with the House recording 30 yes votes and 43 no votes. After debate was cut off by a previous-question motion, the House returned to the original substitute. On final passage, First Substitute House Bill 89 passed the House by voice and roll-call, 39 yes to 35 no, and will be transmitted to the Senate for its consideration.
The bill's immediate effect will depend on Senate action and any enrolling changes. The House debate highlighted two recurring lines of argument: proponents emphasized children’s health and cited medical studies; opponents warned of an encroachment on private property and a potential slippery slope of regulatory reach.
