Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Teen Driver Cellphone Restriction topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

House rejects proposal to ban most cellphone use for drivers under 18

Utah House of Representatives · March 8, 2011
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Responding to safety concerns and questions about parental authority and enforcement, the House rejected Senate Bill 45, a proposal to restrict wireless telephone use by drivers under 18; amendment to make the offense secondary also failed earlier.

The Utah House on March 8 rejected Senate Bill 45, a proposal that would have limited wireless telephone use by drivers under 18 with limited exceptions and a $50 infraction as a learning-oriented penalty.

Representative Perry, the sponsor, said the measure would add to the graduated driver’s license framework with exceptions for medical emergencies, reporting safety hazards, reporting criminal activity and communicating with a parent or guardian. He framed the proposal as public-safety legislation backed by surveys and studies showing distracted driving risk among teenage drivers.

Floor debate was extensive. Supporters described the bill as a measured, educational penalty for teen drivers and cited statistics about crash risk. Opponents said it intrudes on parental authority, questioned enforcement practicality and warned about expanding regulatory reach. Representative Wimmer and others framed the issue as parental responsibility versus legislative safety measures.

An amendment to make the offense secondary (so police could cite only after another violation) was defeated on a roll call, 31 yes to 37 no. On final passage the bill failed, 32 yes to 38 no, and will be filed.

Representative Perry said the lighter fine and educational approach would give officers discretion to emphasize learning over punishment, while opponents said the measure would largely fine parents rather than change teen behavior. The House record shows the amendment and final tallies noted above; the bill did not pass the chamber.