Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the State Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House approves one‑year shift in severance tax threshold, adds $1 million to bond funding
Summary
The Utah House on March 10 amended and passed S.B. 320 to raise the annual severance‑tax diversion threshold from $76 million to $77 million for one year, a change supporters said would free funds for a bond package and critics said weakened a permanent trust intended for long‑term savings. The bill passed 40–34 and goes back to the Senate.
The Utah House amended and passed Senate Bill 320 on March 10, temporarily changing the threshold for diverting oil, gas and mining severance‑tax revenue and increasing near‑term money available for a bond package.
Representative Mel Brown, sponsor of the companion bond bill, told colleagues the amendment (line 42) replaces $76,000,000 with $77,000,000 and said that change would provide “one of the $3,000,000 to fund the bond bill.” Brown described the proposal as a one‑year adjustment to the diversion threshold and defended the Legislature’s authority to set the use of severance revenues.
Representative Nielsen objected to using funds designated for the permanent state trust fund — the account set aside as a savings vehicle for nonrenewable resource revenue — arguing the trust fund was intended to be preserved for long‑term needs. “This money is to be saved for a long term,” Nielsen said, warning that spending before money enters the trust circumvents the three‑quarters vote required to spend trust assets once they are deposited.
Brown and other supporters countered that the move was temporary and designed to meet immediate financing needs tied to the bond package and other budget priorities. After debate and a brief summation by Brown, the House voted to pass S.B. 320 as amended, 40 yes to 34 no. The bill will be returned to the Senate for further consideration.
The amendment and the floor debate centered on a fundamental policy split: whether near‑term financing needs justify reducing amounts that would otherwise be diverted into the permanent trust fund, versus a preference to preserve the trust for long‑term state savings. The amendment changes a specific threshold amount in statute and does not itself appropriate the diverted funds — it sets the diversion point for one year only.
Next steps: S.B. 320, as passed by the House, will be returned to the Senate for further action and any required enrollment and signatures before becoming law.
