Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Lands topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House approves SB221 to coordinate state role in federal land resource management
Summary
The House passed the second substitute of SB221, which seeks to strengthen state input into federal resource-management plans under the Federal Land Policy Management Act of 1976, on a 65-5 vote after expansive debate about local control, conservation and multiple use.
The Utah House on March 8 passed the second substitute of Senate Bill 221, a measure intended to formalize state participation and influence in federal resource-management planning under the Federal Land Policy Management Act of 1976.
Representative Noel, the House sponsor, said SB221 is a "very, very important step" to give the state a stronger role coordinating with the Bureau of Land Management and Forest Service on resource management plans. He argued state plans and county plans should be considered in federal inventory and planning processes and voiced concern about unilateral federal decisions that "completely overrode" prior local planning.
Supporters said the bill would allow Utah to fortify county positions, push back on singular preservation designations that take lands off the table for decades, and provide a vehicle for local input about mining, grazing, water rights and recreation. Representative Hutchings said industry permitting at the federal level can take much longer than state processes and that local stakeholders better understand on-the-ground conditions.
Opponents and questioners sought assurance about conservation and how the state would balance multiple uses. Representative Litvak asked whether the bill addresses preservation for future generations and whether the bill's process would preserve conservation options; the sponsor replied that environmental impact statements and draft management plans include conservation designations and that this bill is intended to restore state involvement in federal planning.
After pro and con floor discussion that included references to Secretarial Order 3310 and longstanding resource-management inventories, the reading clerk announced the passage of the second substitute of SB221 on a 65-5 vote; the bill will be returned to the Senate for signature.
The measure's implementation would require coordination with federal agencies and possibly affect counties, resource users and conservation interests; the floor record did not include final implementing protocols or details of future rulemaking.
