Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Construction Licensing Sb35 topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House passes construction-license changes after extended debate over worker classification
Summary
Second Substitute Senate Bill 35, which sponsors said closes worker-classification loopholes and requires proper workers’ compensation and unemployment coverage, passed the House 64–7 after extended floor debate over regulation and fairness to law‑abiding contractors.
The Utah House approved Second Substitute Senate Bill 35 on Feb. 9, 2011, sending the construction-license bill back to the Senate after adopting textual amendments and a floor debate that reflected a tension between tightening enforcement and concerns about regulatory scope.
Representative Keiser, the House sponsor, said the bill is part of a three‑bill package to address misclassification problems in the construction industry. "What this bill seeks to do is provide workers' compensation and unemployment compensation for all employees in Utah and ensures that all entities are participating in the funds," Keiser said, adding the measure protects consumers from contractors who are not financially solvent and imposes penalties on "rogue" contractors.
Supporters from construction and trade organizations were listed on sponsors’ materials, and several members said the measure levels the playing field for companies that follow the law. Representative Sandstrom urged passage and described the bill as "a step in the right direction to protect workers and to protect abuses in the workplace." Representative Deane and Representative Litback likewise voiced support, emphasizing fairness for compliant contractors and worker safety.
Opponents cautioned against expanding regulation. Representative Dougal said the Legislature should "question how much we're going to continue to add in terms of regulation," and framed the bill as part of a pattern of increased government intervention. Representative Clark urged members to consider the proper role of government in setting standards and said the bill draws a line on who must play by a single set of rules.
The House adopted a targeted amendment (replacing three instances of "and" with "or" in specified lines) that sponsors said clarified intent, then approved the second substitute version of SB35, 64–7, with four members absent. The bill's sponsors said it will be returned to the Senate for further consideration.
Next steps: SB35 was returned to the Senate for concurrence on the House amendments.
