Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Open Meetings Act topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Utah House approves bill clarifying electronic communications under Open Meetings Act
Summary
On Feb. 11 the Utah House passed first substitute House Bill 54, clarifying that routine electronic communications among members of public bodies do not automatically violate the Open Meetings Act while preserving public access to records under GRAMA; the measure passed 62–13 after floor debate about transparency and potential loopholes.
The Utah House on Feb. 11 approved a bill clarifying how members of local public bodies may communicate electronically, voting 62–13 for first substitute House Bill 54.
Representative Craig Powell, the bill sponsor, told colleagues the measure is intended to "encourage the deliberation of members of public bodies through electronic means" and to resolve uncertainty about whether email, text messages or other electronic exchanges amount to a violation of the Open Meetings Act. "Please be aware that this bill does not affect, does not amend and does not curtail the rights of the public to receive records under the Government Records Access Management Act," Powell said on the House floor.
Supporters said the change helps citizen‑legislators who must do committee work outside normal meeting times and keeps routine electronic exchanges from being treated as illegal closed deliberations. Representative Cox told the House the bill "allows that at least outside of a public meeting, there would be no question that we'd be able to communicate" with colleagues by email or other tools.
Opponents raised transparency concerns. Representative King warned that the bill "could unintentionally create a situation where decisions are considered at length, deliberated upon, discussed and all but decided formally in everything but a public meeting," arguing the change could reduce the public's opportunity to see deliberations before votes.
The sponsor and backers said the bill is a first‑step clarification, not a sweeping rewrite, and noted that issues about public notice and on‑the‑record deliberations could be addressed in future bills. After floor discussion and questions, the House approved the first substitute version and sent it to the Senate for consideration.
The measure explicitly preserves records access under the Government Records Access and Management Act (GRAMA) and was supported in committee by testimony citing other states' approaches to electronic communications.
