Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Insurance Regulation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House passes insurance‑law amendments, including requirement for title insurers to maintain in‑state office
Summary
The House amended and passed first substitute HB19, an insurance‑department bill that clarifies definitions, shifts conversion‑notice responsibility to insurers, requires carriers to cover claims during a 30‑day grace period, and requires certain foreign title insurers to maintain a bona‑fide in‑state office for consumer access; the measure passed by recorded vote.
First substitute House Bill 19, the insurance department’s cleanup and policy package, passed the Utah House on Feb. 4 after floor amendments addressing consumer protections and technical clarifications.
Major elements explained by Representative Dunnigan included: a definition of a "bona fide office" (a physical office open during regular business hours), a shift of the responsibility to send conversion notices from employers to insurers for people leaving group plans, a requirement that carriers provide coverage during the 30‑day grace period even if the employer fails to remit premium, and a provision that certain foreign title insurers must maintain a physical in‑state office so consumers and regulators have a local point of contact. The bill also included continuing‑education clarifications, minimum search requirements for title searches, and adjustments to dedicated account language per budget procedures.
Floor action: Representatives offered and adopted friendly and technical amendments, including an amendment to require that escrow officers actually process escrows rather than merely supervise. Representative Christiansen offered an amendment to reinstate notice language in one section, which the sponsor supported and the House approved. After amendments and a period of Q&A, first substitute HB19 passed the House with a recorded vote (70 yes, 0 no) and will be transmitted to the Senate for consideration.
Why it matters: Sponsors said the bona‑fide office requirement responds to consumer complaints where out‑of‑state title carriers left minimal storefront addresses and made enforcement difficult; shifting conversion‑notice duty to insurers is intended to help protect consumers whose employment status changes and COBRA periods lapse.
