Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Department Restructuring topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House approves moving Housing and Community Development into Workforce Services amid debate
Summary
House Bill 139, which moves Housing and Community Development from the Department of Community and Culture to the Department of Workforce Services and establishes a Department of Heritage and Arts, passed after extensive debate about savings, stakeholder input and rural access; the sponsor said the change will save about $1.3 million.
Representative Wayne Harper, sponsor of House Bill 139, presented the measure as the product of a year-and-a-half study and executive-branch recommendations. Harper said the bill implements recommendations from an optimization commission and an executive study to streamline government functions, move housing and community development to Workforce Services, and create a separate Department of Heritage and Arts to focus on museums, libraries and culture. He said the move would produce approximately $1.3 million in savings, citing lease termination, shared software and FTE reductions.
Opponents and questioning members pressed for evidence that the receiving agency (Workforce Services) had been evaluated thoroughly and expressed concern about stakeholder input, particularly the advocacy community that receives funding through housing dollars. Representative Frank and others emphasized that the executive branch had expressed support but some members said they could not find explicit ownership of the study results. Rural representatives warned about service access, noting past consolidation experiences that increased wait times and reduced access to services.
Members debated a floor amendment to delay the effective date (moving it from July 1, 2012, to July 1, 2013) to allow more study and stakeholder outreach. Proponents argued the savings and consumer-service logic justified immediate implementation with statutory guardrails (an advisory council and a one-year no-change period). The motion to amend the effective date failed on a division, and the House subsequently passed HB139 by a vote of 45 yes to 27 no. The bill will be transmitted to the Senate for further consideration.
