Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Election Funding topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

House votes to repeal election campaign fund check-off, sparking debate over public subsidy of parties

Utah House of Representatives · January 26, 2012
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

HB50 would repeal the income-tax 'check-a-box' election campaign fund that directs roughly $120,000 annually to political parties; proponents say it ends a government subsidy to private parties, opponents warn it may shift costs to primaries and disadvantage smaller parties. The House passed it 51–20.

SALT LAKE CITY — The Utah House on Thursday approved House Bill 50 to repeal the income-tax check-off that currently directs taxpayer-designated money to recognized political parties.

Representative Dougal, sponsor of HB50, framed the bill as a separation of government and private political parties: "The key question before us is, should we really tax the citizens of Utah so that some people can then send those tax monies ... to those private entities?" Dougal said, arguing the state should not subsidize private political activity.

Opponents warned repeal could have unintended consequences. Representative Nielsen said removing the subsidy "may significantly disadvantage organizations that want an opportunity to nominate candidates and do not have the financial resources to do that." Others raised questions about whether courts could view election administration and its costs as subsidizing parties and whether primaries would become more expensive for parties if the check-off were removed.

Lawmakers quoted the fiscal note during debate. Representative Dougal and others cited an estimated $120,000 annual flow to parties; Dougal gave a party breakdown from a prior year — about $84,000 to the Republican Party and about $36,000 to the Democratic Party, with smaller amounts to minor parties — while also acknowledging the figures are drawn from fiscal forecasts.

The House debated potential reforms to preserve private-party autonomy while eliminating what sponsors described as a taxpayer-subsidy mechanism. After lively floor debate, the House passed HB50 by a roll-call vote of 51–20; the bill will be transmitted to the Senate for its consideration.

Next steps: HB50 proceeds to the Senate. If enacted, the state will no longer divert the check-off funds to political parties; the transcript records no implementing mechanism or transition cost estimate for primaries if the check-off is repealed.