Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the New Hire Registry topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Utah House reconsiders, passes bill updating new-hire registry amid funding warnings
Summary
After floor debate about federal compliance and employer burden, the House voted 39–33 to reconsider and then pass House Bill 22, which adds date-of-hire fields to the state's new-hire reporting and, supporters said, protects federal funding for child-support and unemployment programs.
Get email alerts on the New Hire Registry topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Utah House on Jan. 24 voted to reconsider its prior action on House Bill 22 and then approved the measure 39–33, sending the bill to the Senate.
Representative Patrick Powell moved to reconsider House Bill 22, saying Weber County had provided additional detail that warranted further discussion. The bill, described on the floor as a technical update to the centralized new-hire registry, would add date-of-hire or date-of-rehire fields to employer reports that already include name, address and Social Security number.
Sponsor Representative Jeremy Peterson told the House the change aligns state reporting with federal requirements and is necessary to avoid losing federal funding for the Office of Recovery Services and the state's TANF program. "We would lose federal funding for the Office of Recovery Services and for our TANF program," Peterson said, arguing the updates also would enable the proper allocation of up to $20 million in back child-support payments and help reduce unemployment-insurance fraud.
Representative Powell, who supported reconsideration, said earlier confusion stemmed from concerns the bill imposed new burdens on employers; he noted that employers already report key data and that the bill adds two specific fields. "It's just two additional pieces of information...date of hire or date of rehire," Powell said.
Opponents raised questions about state tracking and sovereignty. Representative Dougal asked rhetorically why the state should be required to track citizens; other members said employers increasingly shoulder administrative tasks for government.
After a brief delay while staff addressed desk-button and voting-system problems, the House opened the vote. The clerk announced the result: 39 yes, 33 no. The bill passed and will be transmitted to the Senate for consideration.
Next steps: With the House vote complete, the measure proceeds to the Senate. If enacted, the change will be implemented through existing reporting channels identified in the bill text.
