Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Education Funding topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Plan to redirect 25% of future DABC profits to education fails amid concerns about incentives and earmarks

Utah House of Representatives · February 28, 2013
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A proposal to dedicate a quarter of future Utah Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control profits to the state’s weighted pupil unit failed in the House after members raised concerns about earmarks, constitutional budget flexibility and creating moral hazard; the measure failed 24‑47.

A contentious proposal to redirect 25% of future profits from the state alcohol regulator to public education failed in the Utah House on Feb. 28.

Representative Byrd presented second substitute HB271, contending the change would deliver roughly $7.4 million to the WPU (weighted pupil unit) in the first year and could grow in subsequent years without raising taxes. Byrd framed the measure as an opportunity to bring new, ongoing dollars to schools from future DABC profits.

Opponents raised ethical and fiscal concerns. Representative Wilcox said that using alcohol revenue to fund education risks creating perverse incentives for the state to promote a product many residents and legislators view as harmful. “It’s hard…when we’re in the business of profiting from something that most of our constituents don’t believe in consuming,” Wilcox said, urging caution.

Representative Layton and others warned that further earmarking of revenue reduces the state’s budgetary flexibility and could complicate decision‑making in future fiscal years. Several speakers also questioned whether transferring business‑style profits to education could create long‑term dependency and policy conflicts.

An amendment to the bill was adopted, but on the final vote HB271 failed to pass the House, receiving 24 yes votes and 47 no votes. The motion was referred for filing. Sponsor Byrd said the initiative would have provided incremental support to education without raising taxes, but opponents argued the unintended consequences outweighed the benefit.