Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Water Quality topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

House approves 'Safe Drinking Water Disclosure Act' requiring certification and batch analysis for fluoridation additives

Utah House of Representatives · February 5, 2013
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

House Bill 72 requires manufacturers, suppliers or repackers of fluoridation additives to provide ANSI/NSF Standard 60 certification and batch chemical analyses to county health departments and the Division of Drinking Water; sponsor said the bill is aimed at transparency and product safety, not the fluoridation debate itself.

The Utah House passed House Bill 72 on Feb. 5, directing companies that manufacture, supply or repackage water-treatment additives used in fluoridation to provide copies of ANSI/NSF Standard 60 certification and batch-specific chemical analyses to county health departments and the state Division of Drinking Water.

Sponsor Representative Barris opened floor debate by saying, "this is not a fluoride bill," and explained the measure is focused on assuring that products used to fluoridate public water supplies meet NSF 60 standards and that county health departments can verify compliance. Barris cited concerns from a Davis County attorney who said his office could not verify certifications through available public sources.

The bill requires one-time filing of certification paperwork with the county health department and the Division of Drinking Water and requires batch chemical analyses be made available to the water supplier and the public on request. If a county health department finds a supplier not certified, the county may bar that product from local use until compliance is demonstrated. Representative Dee offered an amendment extending the implementation date to July 1 to give local agencies more time to compile records; the amendment was adopted.

Opponents including Representative Paulson and Representative Wylie argued the requirement layered state oversight onto areas already governed by federal standards and material-safety data-sheet processes. Supporters, including Representative Handy and Representative Powell, said the measure advances transparency without creating a new enforcement body, and enforcement would remain with local health departments.

After amendment and debate, the House passed HB72 by recorded vote: 59 yes, 12 no. The bill will be transmitted to the Senate.