Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Campaign Finance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House rejects bill that would have required local ordinances on personal use of campaign funds
Summary
House Bill 17, which would have required counties and municipalities to adopt ordinances defining and prohibiting personal use of campaign funds, failed in the House 29‑45 after members raised concerns about state overreach into local control.
House Bill 17, which would have required counties and municipalities to adopt ordinances defining and prohibiting the personal use of campaign funds, failed in a floor vote on Jan. 29.
Sponsor Representative Grover described HB 17 as an effort to extend current state prohibitions on personal use of campaign contributions to political subdivisions by May 1, 2013, creating an enforcement and penalty mechanism at the local level. Grover said the lieutenant governor's office supports a statewide standard and the bill gives local governments a model to follow.
Opponents, including Representative Nielsen and others, questioned whether the measure improperly mandates local policy and replaces local discretion with a one‑size‑fits‑all approach. Nielsen asked whether the bill merely "encourages" or truly requires counties to enact ordinances; the sponsor replied that the bill does require counties to enact a code. Several members said they were hesitant to impose state mandates on counties and cities.
After debate and questions about local control and enforcement, the House voted to reject HB 17; the clerk announced the final tally was 29 yes to 45 no and the bill failed and will be returned to staff for filing.
The transcript does not record proposed amendments on the floor or a committee fiscal note related to local enforcement.
