Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Student Data And Privacy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House fails to advance expansion of Utah Data Alliance amid privacy and outsourcing concerns
Summary
Third substitute S.B. 34, aimed at continuing the Utah Data Alliance and Utah Futures with limited funding, failed in the House on March 13, 2014 (16–48). Supporters emphasized a useful longitudinal tool for education-to-workforce planning; opponents raised student privacy, governance and potential privatization concerns.
The Utah House debated third substitute S.B. 34 on March 13, a bill intended to continue the Utah Data Alliance and maintain the Utah Futures education‑planning website. Representative Last, the sponsor, said the substitute kept the program running for another year using a mix of funding directed to UEN and other partners and described efforts "to take the funding that was given, to UEN, which was a $1,500,000 1 time or ongoing and $300,000 1 time" to sustain the partnership while officials work out a long‑term plan.
Supporters said the longitudinal data could help students and families connect school performance to likely career and earnings paths. Representative Andreeg outlined the potential benefits and warned about misuse, but said he would support the bill because it keeps the status quo: "...we could say statistically speaking, for a parent guiding their child...you are likely going to make x number of dollars."
Opponents raised privacy and governance concerns. Representative Moss said the bill creates "another panel" that could outsource components of Utah Futures to private providers and expressed reservations about student data protections and board makeup. Other members asked for stronger coordination across agencies and clearer security protocols before expanding the system.
After floor amendments and debate, the third substitute was brought to a vote and failed, 16 yes to 48 no.
