Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Legislative Subpoena Amendments topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House debates legislative subpoena enforcement bill amid concerns over judicial review
Summary
Representative Dunnegan urged concurrence on House Bill 414 to create a bipartisan legislative review mechanism to enforce subpoenas; other members raised concerns that the bill may limit access to judicial review for subpoena recipients.
The Utah House of Representatives debated First Substitute House Bill 414, a measure that would create a bipartisan legislative management review process to hear motions to quash and to compel compliance with legislative subpoenas.
Sponsor Representative Dunnegan said the bill "crafts a mechanism where the legislature can enforce compliance with their subpoenas by creating a… joint management review" that can hear motions to quash and render rulings to compel compliance. He said the change was designed to prevent noncompliance tactics that delay investigations.
Representative Snow commended the sponsor and general counsel for drafting work but said the bill is ‘‘an unusual piece of legislation’’ that needs further review to ensure the rights of individuals subject to subpoenas are protected; Snow offered to help improve the language in the interim.
Representative King asked whether the bill, as written, would bar courts from hearing challenges to the scope, breadth, or validity of a legislative subpoena and said he was concerned about creating a ‘‘one‑way street’’ in which the legislature could seek enforcement in courts but subpoenaed individuals could not obtain judicial review. Representative Dunnegan responded that if enforcement proceeds to criminal contempt or fines, those matters are subject to judicial review and that enforcement could be pursued through the judicial system.
After debate, the House concurred with the Senate amendments to HB 414 and the bill passed final passage with an announced tally of 59 yes and 15 no. Members on the floor said they expect to work on technical fixes and additional protections during the interim before broader use of the authority.
The House returned the bill to the Senate for any signature and further action as required.
