Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Child Protection topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House approves child-protection measure to allow closed juvenile hearings when a parent is suspected in another parent's death
Summary
First Substitute Senate Bill 173 passed the Utah House unanimously March 5, 2014. Sponsors said the bill creates a narrowly tailored juvenile-court process allowing family members to petition for temporary removal of children when a natural parent is suspected, prosecuted or convicted for causing the other parent's death.
Get email alerts on the Child Protection topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Utah House unanimously approved First Substitute Senate Bill 173 on March 5, 2014. The bill expands the juvenile court’s definition of abuse to include situations where a child's natural parent intentionally, knowingly or recklessly causes the death of the other parent, or is prosecuted or convicted for that offense.
Representative Karianne Hall, the House sponsor, outlined a constituent case motivating the bill: a family in which a parent was suspected in the death of the other parent and relatives feared for the safety of minor children. Hall said the legislation was designed to balance parental rights and child safety by allowing family members or other interested parties to petition juvenile court for a closed hearing and temporary removal when warranted, with due process protections.
Floor questions focused on legal thresholds and judicial discretion. Representative Paul (Anderegg) asked whether the bill’s language specifying a ‘‘primary suspect’’ narrowed the trigger compared with earlier drafts that used the word ‘‘suspect.’’ Hall said the change was intentional to narrow the scope. Representatives also asked whether the process could lead to involuntary termination of parental rights; Hall said the statute authorizes temporary custody changes only and does not provide for terminating parental rights.
Some members warned about broad ‘‘reckless’’ language that might encompass tragic but noncriminal accidents. Representative Lehi and others asked whether scenarios such as negligent vehicular deaths could unintentionally trigger the statute; the sponsor and supporters said judges retain discretion, that hearings are not hasty and legal counsel will be involved.
Supporters noted the bill had undergone an extensive interim review and committee consideration and had been amended to thread a balance between parental rights and child safety. The House recorded 72 yes votes and no recorded no votes on final passage. The bill will be returned to the Senate for the president’s signature.
Vote at a glance: First Substitute Senate Bill 173 — 72 yes, 0 no; outcome: passed.
