Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
House approves narrow duty-of-care carve-out for pursuits after court ruling
Summary
The Utah House passed House Bill 20 on Feb. 4, 2014, a narrowly drawn change to civil liability for operators of authorized emergency vehicles during pursuits, after floor amendments that clarified that officers acting outside applicable pursuit policy or with actual intent to harm are not covered. The bill passed 64–10 and will go to the Senate.
The Utah House on Feb. 4 approved House Bill 20, a narrowly tailored change to civil liability that limits an operator of an authorized emergency vehicle’s duty of care to a fleeing suspect when the operator acts within applicable pursuit policy and without intent to harm. Representative Dee, who sponsored the bill, told the House the change responds to a court decision and is not intended to provide blanket immunity for misconduct.
The bill was presented as a response to a court case the sponsor referenced as Tory v. State of Utah; the sponsor said the decision left an officer personally liable in a pursuit and that the Legislature intended to clarify that officers who act within policy should not face individual liability in those circumstances. Representative Dee said the measure does not remove remedies for innocent bystanders and does not shield conduct outside an agency’s pursuit policy.
Floor debate focused on where the line should be drawn between…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
