Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Local Government topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

House approves bill creating "metro townships" for Salt Lake County after extended debate

Utah House of Representatives · March 12, 2015
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After hours of debate and several amendments, the Utah House passed the fifth substitute of SB199 March 12, creating a new 'metro township' option for unincorporated areas of Salt Lake County to lock boundaries and govern local services. Supporters said it protects community identity; opponents warned it creates a new level of government.

The Utah House passed the fifth substitute of Senate Bill 199 on March 12 after an extended floor debate that produced multiple amendments and sustained objection from some members.

Representative Hutchings, the House sponsor, framed the bill as a localized fix aimed at unincorporated areas of Salt Lake County such as Kearns, Magna and Mill Creek. "For most of you this isn't gonna have a big impact. For those of you that live or represent unincorporated areas of Salt Lake County, this is a really important bill," Hutchings told the chamber, saying the measure would let communities "lock our boundaries, and then choose between a couple of options" including incorporation, creating a metro township, or annexation.

The measure creates a new municipal option — a metro township — intended to give unincorporated urban communities protection from piecemeal annexation while preserving local control over services. Sponsors described options for independent metro townships to run services, levy revenues, or to form municipal service districts to pool resources while remaining under county umbrellas.

Debate included sustained objections. Representative Brown warned the bill creates "a whole new level of government," noting it amends many code sections and raises questions about broader application beyond Salt Lake County. Representative Fred Cox proposed an amendment to move the election to 2016 so the vote would align with higher-turnout elections, saying, "This bill is over 7,000 lines" and urging more time to review changes. Another amendment, moved in substitute form by Representative Last, removed a provision that would have authorized metro townships to initiate school-district actions.

Supporters argued the measure is the product of years of interim work and local negotiations. Representative Miller, representing an area affected by annexation disputes, said the bill "is probably as close to perfect as we're gonna get" for resolving long-standing land, service and identity conflicts and urged colleagues to let communities vote and move forward.

The House approved amendment packages during floor consideration, including changes to timing and the removal of certain authorities, and the bill as amended passed the House 68-6. The sponsor said the vote will allow unincorporated communities to secure boundary protection and pursue governance options after a multi-year process of negotiation and interim work. The bill will be transmitted back to the Senate for further consideration.