Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Transportation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Utah House approves transportation funding package after heated substitute fight
Summary
The Utah House passed third-substitute HB 362 to create a market-tied fuel tax and local-option sales tax funding streams for roads and transit after members rejected a substitute that would have shifted more control to cities. The bill passed 51-22 and moves to the Senate.
The Utah House on March 9 approved third substitute House Bill 362, a comprehensive transportation funding plan that ties the motor fuel tax to fuel prices, creates a capped market-based mechanism, and authorizes a voter-approved local sales-tax option for cities and counties.
Representative Ken Anderson, the bill sponsor, said the measure aims to address a 30-year statewide transportation needs assessment and to provide steady funding for road maintenance, new capacity and dedicated transit support. "This bill provides sufficient flexibility to address many types of needs and priority projects locally with that local option," Anderson said during floor debate.
The session’s most contested moment came when Representative (motion maker) offered a fourth-substitute proposal to reallocate local-option shares — combining city and transit set-asides into a single 0.2 percentage-point pot and allowing cities greater discretion to use the funds for local roads or to contribute to transit projects. Supporters of the substitute argued it would give cities more flexibility and correct what they described as an imbalance that had left cities with little money under existing local-option formulas.
Opponents said the substitute threatened a fragile, multi-stakeholder compromise that had been negotiated with the Utah Transportation Coalition, the Utah League of Cities and Towns, the Association of Counties and transit districts. Representative Anderson warned the substitute would "fracture a compromise" and undercut a package endorsed by those stakeholders. Representative Vanderegg and others echoed concerns that the substitute favored one stakeholder group over others.
Members voted on the substitute by voice and then on final passage. The fourth-substitute motion failed by voice. On final passage, third substitute HB 362 received 51 yes votes and 22 no votes. The House recorded that the bill will be transmitted to the Senate for consideration.
What’s next: HB 362 goes to the Utah Senate. If enacted, the bill’s market-tied fuel tax provisions include a floor and a 40-cent cap; local-option proceeds will be distributed under the bill’s allocation formula and include a five-year maintenance-of-effort requirement to prevent supplanting local transport spending.
Attribution: Quotes and attributions herein are from floor remarks by Representative Ken Anderson (sponsor) and debate captured on the House floor transcript for March 9, 2015.
Votes at a glance: Fourth-substitute motion (to replace third substitute) — failed; Final passage of third substitute HB 362 — 51 yes, 22 no. The bill is transmitted to the Senate.
