Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Constitutional Convention topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

House fails to reconsider vote on proposed constitutional convention after heated floor debate

Utah House of Representatives · February 26, 2015
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A motion to reconsider the House’s action on House Joint Resolution 14 — which would call for a convention to propose a single-subject amendment to the U.S. Constitution — failed after extended debate over enforceability and the ability to rescind such authorization.

Salt Lake City — The Utah House on Feb. 25 declined to reopen debate on a controversial resolution calling for a convention to propose amendments to the U.S. Constitution.

A representative moved to reconsider the House's prior approval of House Joint Resolution 14 so the body could offer amendments intended to limit the convention to a single subject and preserve the Legislature's ability to rescind permission. The motion drew extended debate from members on both sides.

Representative Christiansen argued that attempting a 24‑hour amendment to preserve the right to withdraw would not be legally enforceable, warning that once the threshold for a convention was met "there's no way that they can go down that road and you can somehow unring that bell." Representative Chavez Houck opposed the motion, saying the House had already debated the issue thoroughly.

In a personal explanation on the floor, the member who moved to reconsider said they had lost sleep over the initial vote and wanted another chance to offer an amendment and to seek clarity; "I couldn't sleep last night... I did the wrong vote yesterday," the representative said.

After the debate, the Presiding Officer called for a voice vote and then a division. The motion to reconsider required 38 affirmative votes to succeed; the division did not yield the required number and the motion failed. The House then proceeded with other calendar business.

The exchange underscored legal and procedural uncertainties around the mechanics of a multistate convention and the limits of state legislative control over delegates and convention scope.