Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Education Technology topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House approves HB213 to give school community councils a role in device safety and filtering; bill passes 61-13
Summary
The House passed the second substitute of HB213 on Feb. 18, allowing school community councils (and charter corollary bodies) a role in decisions about device configuration and filtering; vote was 61 yes, 13 no. Debate focused on filtering scope, parental roles and funding for filters.
Get email alerts on the Education Technology topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Utah House passed the second substitute of HB213, "Safe Technology Utilization and Digital Citizenship in Public Schools," on Feb. 18 by a 61-13 vote, advancing the measure to the Senate. The bill extends certain local roles to charter-school corollary bodies and creates a formal process for districts and schools that purchase technology to ensure on- and off-campus filtering to prevent students from viewing harmful content.
Sponsor Representative Stephen Stratton (sponsor identified in floor remarks) said the bill was prompted by an incident in which a school iPad contained inappropriate search history that exposed students to explicit material. "This bill ... gives the charter schools the same opportunity as our school community councils in our public schools," Stratton said, and framed the measure as a way to provide an additional "safety gate" at the local level.
Floor debate highlighted differing concerns. Representative Hutchings, describing constituent experiences piloting iPads locally, warned of the risks of handing children internet-capable devices without protections: "It's like giving a 6 year old the car keys," he said, urging support for parental and community safeguards. Representative Cutler supported the bill but cautioned it may give a "false sense of security" because students may circumvent filters and urged inclusion of digital-citizenship education.
Representative Coleman questioned whether expanding school community councils' duties is the appropriate statutory vehicle given their existing role managing school land trust funds; he suggested existing curriculum-review committees might be better suited for some oversight functions. Representative Paul pressed the sponsor on who must pay for required filtering systems; Stratton and the sponsor clarified that a school district or charter school that purchases technology under the section must ensure adequate filtering, and that community councils are not mandated to purchase filters themselves.
The bill's sponsor said the measure is intended to create a local forum for parents, principals and educators to discuss and adopt safeguards, not to be a single, complete solution. After the previous question was adopted and summations waived, the House recorded the final vote and transmitted the bill to the Senate for its consideration.
