Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Water Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House passes HB 25 to restore state engineer's role in reviewing water‑change applications
Summary
The House passed HB 25 to restore the state engineer's ability to consider 'beneficial use' when reviewing change applications after a 2011 Supreme Court decision (Janssen v. Jones) limited that authority; sponsors said the bill provides a quantitative impairment test, pre‑filing conferences for small users, and broad stakeholder support. The bill passed 69–0.
Representative Snow presented House Bill 25 to revise water‑law application procedures and re‑empower the state engineer to examine 'beneficial use' in change applications—a response to the 2011 Janssen v. Jones decision, which the sponsor said unnecessarily limited the engineer's discretion.
The bill’s sponsors described a multi‑year stakeholder process that produced compromise language, including a quantitative impairment test to determine whether a proposed change would harm existing rights and a private pre‑filing conference option intended to help small water‑right holders assess feasibility before filing. Representative Snow distributed a flyer listing many supporting organizations and emphasized the bill’s role in creating predictability for water users.
Floor discussion included questions from water‑law‑experienced members about the bill’s standards for aquifers and how the engineer would evaluate aggregate water availability; the sponsor said the applicant bears the burden to show no quantity impairment and that the engineer retains discretion in complex basins. Supporters representing agricultural and water interests urged passage to restore workable administration.
The House voted and HB 25 passed 69–0; it will be transmitted to the Senate for further consideration. The sponsor and supporters said they anticipate technical follow‑up and are prepared to refine provisions as needed.
