Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Legislation Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Utah House approves a slate of bills on consent, including airport fee repeal and veterans commission changes
Summary
During morning floor time the Utah House passed multiple bills by unanimous or near‑unanimous votes on the consent calendar, including HB 448 (airport fee repeal), HJR 15 (Utah Athletic Foundation), HB 452 (veterans commission amendments), and several Senate substitutes; a 'Votes at a glance' list below summarizes outcomes.
Get email alerts on the Legislation Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Utah House on March 7 approved a package of bills on the consent calendar and by individual final‑passage votes during morning floor time.
Key outcomes at a glance: - Second substitute Senate Bill 52 (rate committee modifications): passed, 66–0. - Senate Bill 162 (Crime Victims Council amendments): passed, 67–0 (later recorded as 67 yes votes). - House Bill 430 (Hole in the Rock State Park designation): passed, 68–0. - House Bill 448 (airport fee amendments — repeal of public airport licensing fees): passed, 69–0. - HJR 15 (Utah Athletic Foundation/Utah Olympic Legacy Foundation joint resolution): passed, 72–0. - HB 452 (Veterans and Military Affairs Commission amendments): passed, 72–0. - First substitute Senate Bill 138 (health insurance coverage for emergency care): passed, 74–0. - HB 396 (Money Management Act amendments): passed, 74–0. - Second substitute HB 428 (Local government bonding amendments): passed, 71–0. - SB 195 (Highway Bridge designation — Jason R. Workman Memorial Bridge): passed, 73–0 then recorded 74–0 in final count.
Sponsors gave short floor explanations for many of the measures. Representative Owens described HB 448 as a governor‑requested repeal of an airport licensing fee that generated about "$460 a year" but cost more to collect than it produces. Representative Stratton characterized HB 430 as recognizing local heritage in Escalante and Garfield County and invited cosponsors.
Several bills were described as technical cleanups or committee cleanup amendments with no substantive policy changes (for example, House Bill 458, HB 3‑30 state fire code revisions, and HB 4‑58 criminal and traffic code amendments). Where a bill was described as non‑substantive, the sponsor noted the change was to align language or effective dates.
Next steps: Bills passed by the House will be transmitted to the Senate for further consideration or signature as appropriate.
