Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Wildfire Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

House backs SB 122 to expand state help for communities facing catastrophic wildfires

Utah House of Representatives · March 9, 2016
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Lawmakers passed a third substitute of SB 122 that changes who may enter cooperative agreements with the state to receive suppression cost support and emphasizes local prevention and mitigation investments; the bill passed unanimously in the House.

The Utah House unanimously passed third substitute Senate Bill 122 on March 9 after the floor sponsor described the measure as a significant change in how the state helps communities fight catastrophic wildfires.

Representative Briscoe told colleagues the main material change in the third substitute was language transferring money to satisfy the legislative fiscal analyst and produce a zero fiscal note. The bill expands eligibility for cooperative agreements so that not just county legislative bodies but cities can enter agreements with the state division of forestry and fire or state lands to receive financial cooperation and suppression assistance in specified catastrophic wildfire events. Under the bill, eligible entities that adopt required prevention, preparedness and mitigation measures could have suppression costs assumed by the state; entities without cooperative agreements would be responsible for suppression costs on their lands.

Briscoe and other supporters framed the change as a shift toward local management and prevention: communities would invest in mitigation and preparedness and the state would step in when agreements were in place. Representative Christofferson and others spoke in support of the measure. The House passed the third substitute 67‑0 and returned the bill to the Senate for further consideration.

The bill’s provisions emphasize local responsibility for prevention and preparedness as a condition for state suppression assistance and create incentives for cooperative agreements between cities, counties and state agencies.